Showing posts with label instructional design teaching learning understanding planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label instructional design teaching learning understanding planning. Show all posts

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Technology Educator's Reflection

This post represents the fifth and final week 5 discussion item for EDLD 5368-Instructional Design.
  • What benefits do you see in educators knowing how to design and implement online learning?

The benefits are boundless. Educators in standard classrooms wishing to enhance their lesson design can implement online learning in order to give students opportunities for exploration outside of standard class time. Additionally, educators can implement online learning in order to provide lesson recovery opportunities for students who might be absent from lessons.

Districts implementing online learning can provide credit recovery for whole classes that students have either missed or failed during the standard school year. Additionally, districts can implement online learning as part of their regular course offering in order to better prepare students to meet the online learning opportunities offered when they get to college. What’s more, teaching “across the curriculum” (Cook, 1995) through integrated online learning can help students truly undersand lessons and encourage students to apply what they learned in one subject to necessary problem solving in another.

  • How will you professionally use your course that you designed?

The professional development course I designed is appropriate for both the classroom teacher and for the corporate trainer to understand more fully the learning styles of his students as well as to achieve the teaching style he hopes to adopt or modify. In my current position in public relations, the class I developed is less relevant than if I became a teacher of students wishing to enter the public relations field. Once my master’s degree is complete, I can then attain a teaching position. As a teacher, I can use the course I designed coupled with Dabbagh’s online theories database (2010) to help students learn techniques to help their students to achieve a higher level of understanding. I can also teach others how to integrate hands-on learning into lesson design.

  • Will you integrate online learning in your role as a teacher/staff developer?

I think integrating online learning is paramount in any modern learning environment. Whether you use it during a standard class time, or you design the online learning for students to “catch up” or get ahead, students will begin to expect online learning opportunities.

What becomes more important in the days ahead is to design relevant and rigorous online learning that corresponds to the curriculum and not simply have online learning for the sake of having it. The online learning should alleviate frustrations, not create them, and should be technically useable in order for students to concentrate on the concepts to be learned instead of spending all their time on the technical side of operating the interface (Shank, 2009)

  • What questions do you still have about online learning?

My questions are simple: What are the leading techniques for creating online learning for handicapped learners?; How can differentiated online instruction best be integrated with the standard differentiated curriculum?; and In what instances is online learning best suited compared to standard personally interactive class time?

  • What will you do with this new learning?

Armed with this new learning I will not hesitate to create online learning opportunities for even the most outwardly simple tasks. Even in my position, I have people at each of our district schools who help me collect news items to publicize about the district. I can create online learning to help them understand timeliness, essential elements of a news story, how to capture and transmit engaging photographs, etc, or as Williams and McTighe state it, to have both knowledge and the ability to transfer it to practical applications. (Ch. 3, p. 41). By directing my helpers to these online courses and giving them the opportunity to excel at what I design, they may become more confident in the materials the submit to me for publication.

Cook, Cathy J. (1995) Critical Issue: Aligning and Articulating Standards Across the Mathematics Curriculum, North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Retrieved April 24, 2010 from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/math/ma400.htm.

Dabbagh. N. (2006). The instructional design knowledge base. Retrieved on March 18, 2010, from http://classweb.gmu.edu/ndabbagh/Resources/IDKB/models_theories.htm

Shank, Patti, Ph.D. (March 5, 2009) Usability Issues That Impact Online Learning. Faculty Focus. Retreived May 15, 2010 from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/instructional-design/usability-issues-that-impact-online-learning/

Wiggins, Grant and Jay McTighe, Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, 2005.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Backwards Planning

The following post was made for the week 3 discussion for EDLD 5368-Instructional Design.

I began my career after college in the Army, and one of the major timesaving planning techniques we learned was backwards planning. Backwards planning is a six step process: Identify the Critical Event; Identify all Preliminary Actions; Arrange the Preliminary Actions in Chronological Order; Estimate the Time Needed for Each Action; Scheduled the Critical Event First, and then Schedule the Preliminary Actions; and Check for Feasiility. I try to use backwards planning in just about every major life event, so I found this concept incredibly easy to wrap my head around.

That being said, I've only ever had one school teacher utilize anything similar to this. I grew up in a small town and had my dad for junior high history. He used to teach his classes from the end of the book first, going backward to the first chapters. This with the thought that the most relevant history for the students happened yesterday. They just needed to know what happened to make yesterday why it was the way it was. Once that was covered, students would be more apt to want to learn more about successive times in history working backwards. I realize this wasn't single lesson design, but it was close.

As for me, I would most likely design lessons like everyone else would design a lesson...learn the standards, assess the weaknesses, write a plan to teach the standards and reinforce the weaknesses, assess, rinse, repeat, etc. As Wiggins and McTighe point out: "more pointedly, how will we ever meet content standards or arrive at hard-won student understandings unless we think through what those goals imply for the learner’s activities and achievements?" Now, see step two from the Army backwards planning process. These two methods are obviously related in that visualizing the activities is the key component of backwards planning.

Describe Backward Planning. (n.d.) General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library. Retrieved April 29, 2010 from https://rdl.train.army.mil/soldierPortal/atia/adlsc/view/public/9092-1/accp/is8700/lsn1obj4.html

Wiggins, Grant. Understanding by Design (Expanded Second Edition). Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, 2005. p 14. Retrieved April 29 from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/lamar/Doc?id=10081770&ppg=26